On 9/11/2015 8:09 AM, Nadeau Thomas wrote: >>> 3. Support for both transactional, synchronous management >>> >> systems as well as distributed, asynchronous management >>> >> systems >>> >> >>> >> a. For asynchronous systems, the ability to request a protocol >>> >> operation to not return (i.e. block) until the intended >>> >> configuration has been fully synchronized. >> > I'm not sure why 3 (a) is a requirement, or its unclear to me where this >> > is specified in the openconfig-netmod-opstate draft. > Anees/Rob, can you guys please add some color to the above descriptions > to help clarify things for Robert? I see (3) but not (3.a) in http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-openconfig-netmod-opstate-01#section-4.2 so am unsure how 3.a made it on the list.
also, I don't object to 3.a if *users* say they need it. Lou _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
