Linda Dunbar <linda.dun...@huawei.com> writes: > Dean, et al, > > Does the following statement in the Section 7 IANA Consideration make > "ietf-acl" equivalent to the long name > "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-access-control-list"? > > urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-access-control-list prefix: ietf-acl > > > If the answer is YES, can the example in Section 4.3 can use "ietf-acl" > directly instead of the long name? > i.e. > <access-lists "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-acl:1.0"> > > > What does the ":1.0" mean in the example?
That example is broken, it's not even well-formed XML. It would be useful if module authors always validate such examples before publishing an I-D. My skeleton project at GitHub shows how to make such a validation an integral part of I-D processing - see the Makefile: https://github.com/llhotka/YANG-I-D Lada > > Thanks, Linda > > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > netmod@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod -- Ladislav Lhotka, CZ.NIC Labs PGP Key ID: E74E8C0C _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
