Dear Netmod, Homenet and MIF.

We are looking for a proper place to discuss attached materials within IETF.
So I would like to say sorry we have to send this letter across several IETF 
WGs simultaneously.

The latest trends show that IP services are getting decoupled from the 
traditional Service Provider (SP) networks. Subscriber can get a lot of 
services from the 3rd party content providers typically delivered over public 
networks, P2P services are also becoming more and more popular and the main 
problem how to achieve service chaining and delivery with proper QoS.
We would like to propose to use Yang for exchange between Subscriber's Device 
and Service Provider's. The Yang-modeled data is transferred over NetConf 
protocol from end-user device activation/management software towards a service 
agent software residing in Subscriber's Device. This approach allows Service 
Provider to identify subscriber uniquely and his QoS requirements within the 
network with multiple IP interfaces on Subscriber's Devices. Multiple IP 
interfaces will be used for service distinction and delivery within SP network. 
Host applications will be divided by application groups and bounded to a 
specific IP interface.

Short solution description:

1) When connecting to the network, Subscriber's Device gets an IP address 
through DHCP and IP of SP's headend device management server through a DHCP 
option. Alternative option is manual configuration of these IP settings; 
Service Agent Software installed on Subscriber's Device makes AAA request to 
Service Provider's configuration management headend software. Based on request 
SP can uniquely identify subscriber and subscriber's QoS requirements.  In case 
Device was authorized successfully, it gets a new IP interface (Tunnel or 
Loopback) and additional configuration parameters (e.g., routing, QoS). SP 
network also will be reconfigured dynamically to meet appropriate service 
delivery KPIs , however static SP environment configuration also possible with 
fixed QoS and bandwidth for each interface based on predefined IP pool.

2) Different application groups can originate service requests from different 
Host IP addresses. Service will be delivered to specific IP addresses with 
appropriate additional handling within SP network and quality of service. 
Subscriber's device can periodically send application-group QoS modification 
requests to allocate more/less priority or/and bandwidth for existing 
application groups within SP network.

Benefits and Applicability:

-              SP don't need to know anything about external services located 
outside their network (Internet services, 3rd party content providers). Service 
identification will be based on local Service Provider IP addresses.

-              QoS configuration will be delivered dynamically based on 
subscriber needs.

-              SP don't need to make any dramatic updates for existing 
environment to identify services, because traffic identification and handling 
will be based on IP stack only.


P.S. Authors are looking forward to developing this approach further. The 
authors have already tested the approach using manual settings
Potential next steps include:
- developing a Host Agent prototype;
- developing a Headend's NETCONF/YANG adapter;
- collaboration with a carrier to arrange a lab trial;
- contributing the code to the open source community.

If you have any kind of questions please feel free to contact us directly 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>, 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

Best Regards,
Maxim Klyus




________________________________
The information transmitted herein is intended only for the person or entity to 
which it is addressed and may contain confidential, proprietary and/or 
privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, 
or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or 
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this 
in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

Reply via email to