Hi Kent,
I support adding this.
Thanks,
Rob
On 14/10/2015 19:56, Kent Watsen wrote:
I created this issue a little more than a week ago, but forgot to CC
the list until now – sorry!
GitHub issue #8 (https://github.com/netmod-wg/opstate-reqs/issues/8) says:
====START====
On the interim call, Rob made in interesting point about
config+operational, using BGP as an example.
Do we need to amend point 4 to allow for a method to retrieve these in
a single operation?
OLD:
4. Separation of configuration and operational state data; ability
to retrieve them independently
A. Be able to retrieve only the derived state aspects of
operational state
B. Be able to retrieve only the non-derived state aspects of
operational state
NEW:
4. Separation of configuration and operational state data; ability
to retrieve them both together and independently
A. Be able to retrieve only the derived state aspects of
operational state
B. Be able to retrieve only the non-derived state aspects of
operational state
C. Be able to retrieve both the derived and non-derived state
aspects of operational state together
====STOP====
Any objections to adding 4C?
Thanks,
Kent
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
