Hi,
"Acee Lindem (acee)" <a...@cisco.com> wrote:
> We had a lot of good discussions at IETF 94 with respect to the
> ietf-routing and how it could be augmented in the future to support I2RS.
> These discussions are ongoing.
>
> One current change that I would like to propose is to change the base
> instance container from routing-instance to networking-instance.
Is the idea to simply rename the "routing-instance" container to
"networking-instance"?
Then we would have:
+--rw routing
+--rw networking-instance
Would you keep the top-level name "routing"?
/martin
> This
> would provide an instance definition that could be augmented for L2
> protocols and service functionality as well as L3. It is also consistent
> with the term used in both
> https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-rtgyangdt-rtgwg-device-model-01.txt and
> https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-openconfig-rtgwg-network-instance-01.txt.
>
> Thanks,
> Acee
>
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> netmod@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
