Excellent, thanks! Queueing fixes to the below up for next version.
> On Dec 8, 2015, at 12:14 AM, Jonathan Hansford <[email protected]> wrote: > > I’ve picked up some possible typos in the document. Being British, I accept > some of these may purely reflect different approaches to a common (!) > language. > > Section 2 > · s/to developing YANG model/to developing a YANG model > · s/benefits that appeals/benefits that appeal > · s/this documents suggests/this document suggests > · s/YANG Models describes/YANG Models describe > · s/Layering of models allow for/Layering of models allows for > · s/e.g/e.g. > · s/with experience from/with experience of > Section 2.1 > · s/YANG models defines/YANG models define > Section 3 > · s/and to Network Service/and Network Service > Section 3.1 > · s/lifecycle of these models are/lifecycle of these models is > Section 3.2 > · s/to, or adopted by/to or adopted by > · s/lifecycle of these models are/lifecycle of these models is > · Section 3.3 > · s/what is covered/that covered > > HTH, > > Jonathan > > > From: [email protected] > Sent: 08 December 2015 02:17 > To: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: [netmod] I-D > Action:draft-ietf-netmod-yang-model-classification-00.txt > > > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > directories. > This draft is a work item of the NETCONF Data Modeling Language Working Group > of the IETF. > > Title : YANG Model Classification > Authors : Dean Bogdanovic > Benoit Claise > Carl Moberg > Filename : > draft-ietf-netmod-yang-model-classification-00.txt > Pages : 9 > Date : 2015-12-07 > > Abstract: > The YANG [RFC6020] data modeling language is currently being > considered for a wide variety of applications throughout the > networking industry at large. Many standards defining organizations, > open source software projects, and vendors are using YANG to develop > and publish models of configuration, state data and operations for a > wide variety of applications. At the same time, there is currently > no well-known terminology to categorize various types of YANG models. > > A consistent terminology would help with the categorization of > models, assist in the analysis the YANG data modeling efforts in the > IETF and other organizations, and bring clarity to the YANG-related > discussions between the different groups. > > This document describes a set of concepts and associated terms to > support consistent classification of YANG models. > > > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-yang-model-classification/ > > There's also a htmlized version available at: > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netmod-yang-model-classification-00 > > > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. > > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod > > > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
