Cool. Thanks for the update! > On Dec 15, 2015:2:19 PM, at 2:19 PM, Robert Wilton <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Tom, > > On 15/12/2015 17:10, Nadeau Thomas wrote: >>> On Dec 15, 2015:12:08 PM, at 12:08 PM, Juergen Schoenwaelder >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 04:48:21PM +0000, Kent Watsen wrote: >>>> The minutes for IETF 95 show that there was in-room support for adopting >>>> draft-wilton-netmod-intf-ext-yang as a WG draft. The minutes also show >>>> that this decision would be confirmed on the mailing list, which I am >>>> doing now. >>>> >>>> Should we move to adopt draft-wilton-netmod-intf-ext-yang as a WG item and >>>> correspondingly add this to the WG charter as a milestone? Please comment >>>> by Tuesday, December 22, 2015 at 9AM EST at which time the WG Chairs will >>>> gauge whether or not there is consensus to move forward with the document. >>>> >>> This I-D contains some Ethernet specific definitions. Are we going to >>> define Ethernet specific things in the IETF or is IEEE ready to take >>> over data models for 'their' interfaces? In other words, what exactly >>> is the scope of this work? >> The IEEE has officially started working on Ethernet models on >> the public github repo here, so I suggest taking a look at that for any >> overlaps. >> >> https://github.com/YangModels/yang/tree/master/experimental/ieee > The latest (work in progress) models are actually at: > https://github.com/8023YangDesignTeam/EthernetYang/tree/master/experimental/ieee/802.3 > > This repo is a direct fork of YangModels so that we can iterate the IEEE > 802.3 models at a faster pace, with an intention that we periodically fold > the IEEE model updates back into YangModels when they have been reviewed and > reached some level of stability and consensus in the design team. > > Thanks, > Rob > > >> >> —Tom >> >>> And (likely depending on the answer to the first question), is it >>> meaningful to produce an interface extension module or is it better to >>> simply carefully revise the model we already have? >>> >>> If we add something to the work of this WG, what will be realistic >>> milestones and how do we make sure we stay focused? Is there a need >>> for some prioritization? >>> >>> /js >>> >>> -- >>> Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH >>> Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany >>> Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> netmod mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod >> _______________________________________________ >> netmod mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod >
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
