> On Dec 16, 2015:3:55 AM, at 3:55 AM, Benoit Claise <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>>> On 15 Dec 2015, at 13:34, Nadeau Thomas <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> NETMOD:
>>>
>>> The Broadband Forum and the members of the design team who worked on the
>>> IETF Entity module have asked that the working group considerthe
>>> ietf-entity YANG module
>>> (currently https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-entitydt-netmod-entity/
>>> which is
>>> still in individual draft status) as a working group item.
>>>
>>> Should we move to adopt draft-entitydt-netmod-entity as a WG item and
>>> correspondingly add this to the WG charter as a milestone? Please comment
>>> by
>>> Tuesday, December 22, 2015 at 9AM EST at which time the WG Chairs will
>>> gauge whether or not there is consensus to move forward with the document.
> Support.
>> I would strongly prefer to finish the existing items first, or at least the
>> critical ones on which other work depends. Adding more items would mean that
>> both old and new items receive less attention on the average. We already
>> have at most one or two reviews per WGLC, and this is IMO insufficient.
> While I understand the concern of work prioritization, one of the issues in
> NETMOD is that we need to grow the number of people involved in
> participating/editing/reviewing, and I'm happy to see Dan and Jimmy taking
> the lead here.
>
> Regards, Benoit
Are you speaking as AD or as an individual?
—Tom
>>
>> Lada
>>
>>> —Tom
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> netmod mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>> --
>> Ladislav Lhotka, CZ.NIC Labs
>> PGP Key ID: E74E8C0C
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> netmod mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
