On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 7:49 AM, Ladislav Lhotka <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, > > if we want people to take YANG modules appearing in I-Ds seriously and > implement them, then we should apply the revisioning rules to them. That > is, if a module changes between two I-D revisions, then its revision-date > has to be bumped and a new entry added to the revision history. As it is > now, the I-D-based modules are esentially revisionless. > > The revision rules only apply to published modules. In IETF-speak, that means an RFC. An Internet Draft is a work-in-progress. We update the revision date every time the module changes, but the numerous incremental changes for a work-in-progress should not be recorded in the module revision history. They should be recorded in the Change Log appendix. I will try to make this procedure more clear in the YANG guidelines draft. > Lada > > Andy > -- > Ladislav Lhotka, CZ.NIC Labs > PGP Key ID: E74E8C0C > > > > > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod >
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
