> On 21 Dec 2015, at 19:02, Juergen Schoenwaelder > <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 06:47:49PM +0100, Benoit Claise wrote: > >> I hope that nobody disagrees that the operational state design and how >> to structure the models are the two blocking factors to publish YANG >> models. If you disagree or don't see this, let me know, I should >> communicate better. > > Even if it may spoil your day, I disagree that there is a blocking > factor that should stop us from publishing models. There seem to be > ways to address the requirements without having to block all work or > to redo what that we have published. But sure, if you make it a > blocking factor, it will be one.
I agree with Juergen. It is not clear to me how the proposed split between intended and applied configuration is supposed to affect the data models we are working on. Lada > >> I hope that nobody really believes that because some people in IETF (or >> in any other SDOs) thinks that what those operators want is a bad idea, >> those operators will not get what they request/pay for from their suppliers. > > To be fair, those operators also tell us that they use protocols that > are not IETF protocols and it remains somewhat unclear what those > protocols are we are expected to optimize data model solutions for. > > /js > > -- > Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH > Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany > Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/> > > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod -- Ladislav Lhotka, CZ.NIC Labs PGP Key ID: E74E8C0C _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
