Yes, this is correct. We agreed to this explicitly.
—Tom
> On Jan 11, 2016:6:29 AM, at 6:29 AM, Juergen Schoenwaelder
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I think we discussed at one of the previous IETFs that we will use
> YANG 1.1 in the IETF once it is published. Please check the archives.
> If I am correct, then you would have to be fast with finishing the ACL
> model.
>
> /js
>
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 12:16:40PM +0100, Dean Bogdanovic wrote:
>> Are there any other opinions on switching YANG version for ACL model from
>> 1.0 to 1.1? Would like to get more opinions on this, besides Martin.
>>
>> Dean
>>
>>> On Jan 8, 2016, at 1:26 PM, Martin Bjorklund <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Dean Bogdanovic <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Jan 8, 2016, at 1:09 PM, Juergen Schoenwaelder
>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 12:52:37PM +0100, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
>>>>>> Juergen Schoenwaelder <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 04:21:42PM +0100, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> With YANG 1.1, a leafref can be marked as "require-instance false",
>>>>>>>> which allows a interface-state-ref to be used in config:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> type if:interface-state-ref {
>>>>>>>> require-instance false;
>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>> // + add description that explains what happens if there is no such
>>>>>>>> // instance
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> (NOTE: this doesn't work w/ pyang at the momement, I am working on a
>>>>>>>> fix)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And it would have to be if:interface-ref instead
>>>>>>> if:interface-state-ref
>>>>>>> I think.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No, I meant interface-state-ref. This way you can put a filter on
>>>>>> non-configured interfaces.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> But with require-instance false, this is also true for
>>>>> if:interface-ref. If I preconfigure and interface, I might also want
>>>>> to preconfigure ACLs refering the preconfigure interface. And note
>>>>> that if:interface-state-ref refers to a config false leaf.
>>>>
>>>> In this case we have to change to yang-version 1.1. The plan was to
>>>> have it for 1.0. Do we want to move the ACL model to YANG minimum
>>>> version 1.1?
>>>
>>> I think it is ok. We're fixing issues like this one in 1.1 so that we
>>> don't have to rely on various workarounds. Note that the second WGLC
>>> for 1.1 just ended, w/ mostly minor proposed edits.
>>>
>>>
>>> /martin
>>
>
> --
> Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
> Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
> Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>
>
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
