[As a contributor] Hi Benoit,
Thank you for your proactive AD review. Below are my responses to your comments. >- Editorial: I see many instances of (see term) or (see terms). >This doesn't add any value IMO. >If there are some chance for misinterpretation of those terms, >capitalize the terms specified in the terminology section. I removed “(see term[s])” from my local copy. I view this as an editorial change. >- Any reason why the "backwards compatibility" (section 3) is not >numbered as a requirement in section 4? I.e. a new requirement 5. Or is >it because it's a special requirement? >Numbering all the requirements might ease the comparison of the 3 >different proposed solutions. FWIW, the Backwards Compatibility section was not initially incorporated into the Requirements section because it seemed more like an implicit/generic requirement, not a solution-specific requirement. That said, I have to agree that it would help reviews. For instance, when trying to determine how a solution satisfies each requirement, it would be easier to have “Backwards Compatibility” folded into the Requirements “tree”, rather than having to call it out special. So, if no one objects, I will make this change tomorrow. >- There is a requirement in asynchronous configuration operations >definition: > Once applied, there MUST be a mechanism for the client > to determine when the request has completed processing and > whether the intended config is now fully effective or there are > any errors from applying the configuration change, which could be > from an asynchronous notification or via a client operation. > >Why isn't it a numbered requirement in section 4? Good point, it does read like a requirement more so than a term. I note that requirement 2-B has overlap with the "or via a client operation" clause, so I think it makes sense to move this text into requirement 2-B. Again, if no one objects, I will make this change tomorrow. Thanks again, Kent _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
