Martin Bjorklund <m...@tail-f.com> writes: > Hi, > > Andy Bierman <a...@yumaworks.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> The action-stmt example on page 27 is wrong. >> The <action> element is missing. It is shown correctly >> on page 105. >> p27 >> <rpc message-id="102" >> xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:base:1.0"> >> <interface xmlns="http://acme.example.com/system";> >> <name>eth1</name> >> <ping> >> <destination>192.0.2.1</destination> >> </ping> >> </interface> >> </rpc> >> >> >> p105 >> >> <rpc message-id="101" >> xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:netconf:base:1.0"> >> <action xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:1"> >> <server xmlns="http://example.net/server-farm";> >> <name>apache-1</name> >> <reset> >> <reset-at>2014-07-29T13:42:00Z</reset-at> >> </reset> >> </server> >> </action> >> </rpc> > > Fixed. > >> Sec. 7.15 provides few details wrt/ input processing. >> Extra input is ignored? (draft is silent about that). >> YANG attributes like "insert"or "operation" are ignored? (also silent). > > Right, just as the text for rpcs. Do you think we need to add some > text about this? > >> Sec 7.15.2, para 2 is not clear whether the XML hierarchy >> has to exist in any particular datastore (or opstate). >> Since there is no mention of datastores in 7.15, I >> assume the text just refers to the input containing >> schema-valid XML, which may or may not correspond >> to actual data instances somewhere inn the server. > > Yes.
Hmm, so if I understand in correctly, actions can be attached also to state data nodes. But sec. 7.15.2 says: "For lists, all key leafs MUST also be included." What if a list in state data has no keys? Lada > > > /martin > > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > netmod@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod -- Ladislav Lhotka, CZ.NIC Labs PGP Key ID: E74E8C0C _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
