Hi Yong, The formatting on your message makes it difficult to read - please consider sending to the list using plain text.
Otherwise, see below for comments - look for [KENT]... Thanks, Kent From: netmod <netmod-boun...@ietf.org<mailto:netmod-boun...@ietf.org>> on behalf of Yong Zhu <yong....@ericsson.com<mailto:yong....@ericsson.com>> Date: Thursday, January 28, 2016 at 10:51 AM To: "netmod@ietf.org<mailto:netmod@ietf.org>" <netmod@ietf.org<mailto:netmod@ietf.org>>, Yong Zhu <yong....@ericsson.com<mailto:yong....@ericsson.com>> Subject: [netmod] Question on the output of <get> rpc-reply for operational model? Hi Work group, We got some question regarding netconf operation’s rpc-reply output. For example, we have draft operational model as follows (list AAA contains list BBB which contains list CCC): list AAA { key "aaa_name"; config false; leaf aaa_name { type string; } leaf aaa_leaf1 { type int32; } list BBB { key "bbb_name"; config false; leaf bbb_name { type string; } leaf bbb_leaf1 { type uint32; } list CCC { key "ccc_name"; config false; leaf ccc_name { type string; } leaf ccc_leaf1 { type uint32; } } //list CCC } //list BBB } //list AAA The netconf request is the following: [KENT] the request seems to be missing here What is the expected ? [KENT] this depends on what data is configured on the server More specifically, will CCC’s key (leaf ) be included in rpc-reply? Will AAA/BBB’s key (leaf / ) be included in rpc-reply? [KENT] generally, list keys are returned (e.g., "aaa_name”). The usage example here shows how a list is encoded in XML: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6020bis-09#section-7.8.3.1 The following is what I am thinking now. Please comment. my AAA name //??? my BBB name //??? my CCC name //??? my ccc leaf1 name [KENT] I don’t understand this at all. Thanks /Yong
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
