Tom, One mailing list suggestion was using yang 1.1 construct. If we do it without that suggestion, then the model doesn’t require update, but it is better with this suggestion
Dean > On Feb 3, 2016, at 7:52 PM, Nadeau Thomas <tnad...@lucidvision.com> wrote: > > > Will your model require any updates once 1.1 is ratified? We don’t > want to predicate having a bunch of models move forward on the 1.1 work > moving forward. > > —Tom > > >> On Feb 3, 2016:11:45 AM, at 11:45 AM, Dean Bogdanovic <ivand...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> Tom, >> >> We will publish ACL model requiring YANG 1.1 as per discussion on the list >> >> Dean >> >>> On Feb 3, 2016, at 4:35 PM, Lisa (Yi) Huang <lyihu...@juniper.net> wrote: >>> >>> Tom, >>> >>> We discussed the review comments in the working group in offline meeting. >>> Will publish a new draft to address comments. Thanks, >>> >>> Lisa >>> >>> On 2/1/16, 8:01 AM, "netmod on behalf of Nadeau Thomas" >>> <netmod-boun...@ietf.org on behalf of tnad...@lucidvision.com> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> ACL Doc Authors: >>>> >>>> What is your status and plan to address the numerous technical comments >>>> that have arisen since the WG LC? >>>> I know there are for example, numerous detailed comments from Juergen and >>>> I think Elliot Lear posted some too. >>>> >>>> ‹Tom >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> netmod mailing list >>>> netmod@ietf.org >>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod >>> >> > _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
