Martin, On 2/4/2016 3:22 PM, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > The way I understand the requirement from Lou et. al, which is also > what structural mount supports, is a way to mount (or "relocate") a > set of modules under a certain path. Currently the complete subtrees > defined by this module set is mounted. This includes any augments. > So for example, if you mount ietf-interfaces and ietf-ip under /x:foo, > the result would be: > > /x:foo/if:interfaces/if:interface/ip:ipv4/... > /x:foo/if:interfaces/if:interface/ip:ipv6/... > > etc. > > Structural mount does not currently support mounting of specific > subtrees. > > I agree with Juergen that the term "top-level module" maybe is > misleading. (In fact, I thought that this term refered to something > else - once you have mounted ietf-interfaces in the module "x" as > above, I thought that "x" was the top-level module, and ietf-interface > was the non-top-level module).
So what's a better way of referring to the type of mounted module? Lou _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
