Ladislav Lhotka <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I found one thing that may need clarification: consider a module > containing deviations that's present in the "module" list as > required. What happens if such a module does not appear in the "deviation" > list of a module to which its deviation(s) are supposed to apply? Does > it mean that such deviations are ignored?
Yes. Just as it does today with similar info in <hello>. Note that this is not an error. For example, you might have a deviation module that deviates A and B, but in one particular implemementation, only the deviation for A applies. /martin > This doesn't seem to be specified in the description of the "deviation" > list, or elsewhere. > > Lada > > Mahesh Jethanandani <[email protected]> writes: > > > The yang-library draft went through a Last Call that ended January 22. > > Martin has taken the suggestions from the last call comments and posted an > > updated draft. > > > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netconf-yang-library-04 > > <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netconf-yang-library-04> > > > > Please review it for the changes made to the draft and any edits that were > > either missed or are not right. This would not be a time to bring in new > > changes or comments. > > > > The comment/review period will go till Monday, February 15, at which time > > it will be sent to our fearless AD, Benoit Claise for publication. > > > > Cheers. > > > > Mahesh & Mehmet. > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Netconf mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf > > -- > Ladislav Lhotka, CZ.NIC Labs > PGP Key ID: E74E8C0C > > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod > _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
