On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 05:26:13PM +0100, Eliot Lear wrote: > Juergen, > > On 2/8/16 5:20 PM, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: > > > None of the existing tools that assume YANG defined data is XML > > encoded according to RFC 6020 will not be able to process data in a > > new encoding. > > Reversing you're negatives you are asserting that all existing tools > that assume that YANG defined data is XML encoded will be able to > process data in a new encoding. Is that really what you meant to say? > If so, could you kindly explain what you mean by "tools"? > > Yours for less double negatives... >
Sorry, a non native speaker screwing this up. s/None of/All/ /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/> _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
