Hi Lada,





>>In yesterday's meeting, Lou (I think?) mentioned a use case for mount
>> that is not documented in draft-rtgyangdt-rtgwg-device-model; the need
>> for being able to specify modules to mount directly in the schema.
>> Something like this:
>> 
>>  container root {
>>    ymnt:mount-point "lne" {
>>      ymnt:mount-module "ietf-interfaces";
>>    }
>>  }
>> 
>
>It is IMO impossible to use YANG extensions for similar purposes because it 
>fundamentally changes YANG semantics.


Please say more.  I don’t see the issue.  Naturally there would need to be an 
RFC that defines the semantics of this YANG extension, what else would be 
missing?

K.

_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

Reply via email to