William Ivory <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm looking for clarification on the meaning of the following > paragraph in section 6.4.1 (XPATH context) in RFC6020bis: > > 'If a node that exists in the accessible tree has a non-presence > container as a child, then the non-presence container also exists in > the tree.' > > It's unclear to me what this is trying to say, and why - for example, > does this mean that I need to validate any 'must' and 'when' > statements on the child container even when nothing within that child > container is configured?
must expressions are always evaluated if the node where the must expression is defined exists, regardless of the number of children this node has. /martin _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
