I once again point to section 4.3 and more specifically to section
4.3.3 of RFC 6244. There have also been several I-Ds and discussions
during past WG meetings on how to deal with this issue. See for
example this:

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bjorklund-netmod-operational-00

Some of the discussion took place in NETCONF. See for example

http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/84/minutes/minutes-84-netconf
http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/85/minutes/minutes-85-netconf

It is actually interesting to look at Phil's slides:

http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/85/slides/slides-85-netconf-6.pdf

This was November 2012, i2rs was just getting born and open config
likely did not even exist. All I want to point out is that this is not
a new topic for people who have been around long enough and yes there
were quite some discussions before we created the structure that is
found in a couple of RFCs.

The RFCs are reasonably consistent in saying what a configuration
datastore is. The rest simply never was defined and so you can't find
an answer in the RFCs (except perhaps section 4.3.3 of RFC 6244
documenting that whether operational state is a datastore or not is
somewhat undefined).

/js (in his historian role ;-)

On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 04:20:18PM +0000, Robert Wilton wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> In some of the previous opstate related discussions on this alias, I had 
> some confusion as to which datastore operational state is held in (or 
> whether it is held in a datastore at all :-)
> 
> It also seems that the NETCONF/YANG related RFCs are vague on whether 
> operational state is actually held in a datastore, or if so what it is.  
> I've given some snippets below.  Is this something that needs to be 
> clarified as errata to those standards (particularly NACM)?
> 
> --
> 
> rfc6020bis, section 7.21.1.  The config Statement states:
> 
> "   If "config" is "false", the definition represents state data. Data
>    nodes representing state data are not part of configuration
>    datastores."
> 
> ... which obviously indicates that they are not part of any 
> configuration datastore, but doesn't indicate that they are part of an 
> operational state datastore.
> 
> --
> 
> rfc6241 (section 1.1 terminology) defines datastore and configuration 
> datastore as:
> 
>    o  datastore: A conceptual place to store and access information.  A
>       datastore might be implemented, for example, using files, a
>       database, flash memory locations, or combinations thereof.
> 
>    o  configuration datastore: The datastore holding the complete set of
>       configuration data that is required to get a device from its
>       initial default state into a desired operational state.
> 
> 
> The NETCONF RFC then goes on to describe/use configuration datastores in 
> various ways, but makes no further mention of any operational state 
> datastore.
> 
> E.g. the one line description of a NETCONF get request is "Description: 
> Retrieve running configuration and device state information."
> 
> --
> 
> rfc6536 NACM, (section 3.2.  Datastore Access) states:
> 
>    Only the standard NETCONF datastores (candidate, running, and
>    startup) are controlled by NACM.  Local or remote files or datastores
>    accessed via the <url> parameter are not controlled by NACM.
> 
> 
> Which implies that if operational state is held in a datastore then it 
> is not controlled by NACM - which presumably can't be right.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Rob
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>

_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

Reply via email to