Hi, this revision is based on the IETF LC. In particular, Robert Sparks suggested in his Gen-ART LC review to include an explanation as to why we chose a YANG extension rather than a built-in statement. I added a paragraph at the end of Introduction, please have a look, I hope it's a fair account that shouldn't cause any controversy.
Thanks, Lada > Begin forwarded message: > > From: [email protected] > Subject: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-netmod-yang-metadata-05.txt > Date: 10 March 2016 at 09:37:07 GMT+1 > To: "Ladislav Lhotka" <[email protected]> > > > A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-netmod-yang-metadata-05.txt > has been successfully submitted by Ladislav Lhotka and posted to the > IETF repository. > > Name: draft-ietf-netmod-yang-metadata > Revision: 05 > Title: Defining and Using Metadata with YANG > Document date: 2016-03-10 > Group: netmod > Pages: 20 > URL: > https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-netmod-yang-metadata-05.txt > Status: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-yang-metadata/ > Htmlized: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netmod-yang-metadata-05 > Diff: > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-netmod-yang-metadata-05 > > Abstract: > This document defines a YANG extension statement that allows for > defining metadata annotations in YANG modules. The document also > specifies XML and JSON encoding of annotations and other rules for > annotating instances of YANG data nodes. > > > > > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. > > The IETF Secretariat > -- Ladislav Lhotka, CZ.NIC Labs PGP Key ID: E74E8C0C _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
