Context: we already did the call for adoption on: draft-wilton-netmod-intf-ext-yang draft-entitydt-netmod-entity
And now we may want to verify IPR on them as well... I for one think that it’s a fine idea and want to thank Lou for suggesting it. Thanks, Kent On 3/10/16, 4:39 PM, "netmod on behalf of Lou Berger" <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote: >Hi, > I'd like to propose that the WG follow the same process that I've >used in other WGs with respect to IPR polling. In particular, that the >template included below be sent to all authors and contributors named in >a draft as part of: >1) WG acceptance (this is new for the WG), and >2) WG last call (only the template format is new) > >Please send any concerns/comments you may have to the list. We will >start using this process in about a week assuming no objections. > >Thank you, >Lou >(new NETMOD co-chair) > >The template is as follows: > >To: <individual_emails_in_draft> <...> >cc: WG, chairs >Subject: Regarding IPR on <draft-netmod-...> > >Authors, Contributors, WG, > >As part of the preparation for WG Last Call > >Are you aware of any IPR that applies to draft identified above? > >Please state either: > >"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft" >or >"Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft" > >If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules >(see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)? > >If yes to the above, please state either: > >"Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules" >or >"No, the IPR has not been disclosed" > >If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think >appropriate. > >If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the >above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are >aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next >stage until a response has been received from each author and listed >contributor. NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S >TO LINES. > >If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed >as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under >the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are >aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from >participating in any contribution or discussion related to your >undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above >and >http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty. > >Thank you, >NETMOD WG Chairs > >PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your >response. > > > > > >_______________________________________________ >netmod mailing list >[email protected] >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
