I was just thinking about how we always talk about yang-1.1, yang-1.2, 
yang-2.0, so I figured yang-next  ;)


From: "Alexander Clemm (alex)" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Thursday, March 10, 2016 at 9:29 PM
To: Kent Watsen <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, 
"[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: RE: yang-next

How about calling it YANGNG?
Cheers
--- Alex

From: netmod [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Kent Watsen
Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2016 6:13 PM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: [netmod] yang-next


All,

I see too many emails go by where someone has an idea that they’d like to get 
into a future version of YANG, and keep wishing that there were an easy way to 
capture these feature requests.  With that in mind I created a new Github 
repository called "yang-next”.    This repository is not for a draft, yet, its 
current existence is solely to have a publicly editable issue tracker.   Please 
feel free to add all your good ideas (just one idea per issue please) here: 
https://github.com/netmod-wg/yang-next/issues.

Cheers,
Kent




_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

Reply via email to