No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.
Thanks,
Rob
On 16/03/2016 18:18, Kent Watsen wrote:
[This regards the new pre-adoption process described by
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netmod/current/msg15520.html]
Authors, Contributors, WG,
As part of the preparation for WG Last Call, are you aware of any IPR
that applies to draft identified above? Please state either:
"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
or
"Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
(see RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details)? If yes to the
above, please state either:
"Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
or
"No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
appropriate.
If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer
the above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you
are aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the
next stage until a response has been received from each author and
listed contributor. NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS
MESSAGE’S TO LINES.
If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not
listed as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations
under the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if
you are aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain
from participating in any contribution or discussion related to your
undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed
above and
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.
Thank you,
NETMOD WG Chairs
PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your
response.
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
