Hi Lada, On 3/24/16 3:23 PM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > Hi Eliot, > > I agree it would be useful to be able to sign configuration data in an > encoding-independent way, but it is not an aim of this document to deal with > this problem. Encoding-specific approaches are of course available, this > probably needn't be mentioned.
I totally understand, and I'm not even asking that this group take on coding that stuff in an independent way. A simple reference in security considerations along the lines that Kent suggested is fine. Eliot
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
