Andy Bierman <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The following restriction is not reflected in the ABNF.
> Same issue in RFC 6020.
>
> 9.3.3
> <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6020bis-11#section-9.3.3>.
> Restrictions
>
> A decimal64 type can be restricted with the "range" statement
> (Section 9.2.4
> <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6020bis-11#section-9.2.4>).
In 6020:
decimal64-specification = fraction-digits-stmt
In 6020bis:
decimal64-specification = ;; these stmts can appear in any order
fraction-digits-stmt
[range-stmt]
So I think it is correct in 6020bis.
/martin
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
