On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 11:26:36AM +0100, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 12:42:27PM +0100, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: > > So perhaps the proposal is to add > > > > After applying all deviations announced by a server, in any order, > > the resulting data model MUST still be valid. > > > > just before the beginning of section 7.20.3.1? > > I like to see whether we have consensus to add this clarifying > sentence. I believe it documents something that we always assumed to > be true but we did not write it down explicitly. If anyone disagrees > with adding this clarification, please speak up now. >
I have not heard anyone disagreeing with adding this clarification. Martin did not put this additional sentence into -12 and since we seem to have consensus on adding this clarification I like to ask him to add this sentence if another revision is made before the IESG telechat. I am CCing Benoit in case he wants to add this as a comment to his IESG evaluation record. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/> _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
