Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 01:06:42PM +0200, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Martin has posted revision -13 of the YANG 1.1 specification. This
> > revision incorporates all comments that we have received during the
> > IESG process. A big thanks in particular to our gen-art and ops-dir
> > reviewers and to Martin for following up on the issues. Please check
> > the edits do make sure that nothing broke. The diff can be found
> > here:
> > 
> > https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6020bis-13.txt
> > 
> > Note that this is _not_ the time to raise new issues or to suggest
> > alternate resolutions to issues discussed before. This is only a check
> > to verify that the edits were done correctly. Please check the edits
> > as soon as possible, any errors found must be raised by Thursday
> > 2016-06-16.
> 
> I just finished my review of the changes. Things look pretty good to
> me. I found a little nit though:
> 
>    There is no ambiguity if both modules define the type, since
>    there is no ambiguity.

I'll remove the last part of this sentence.


/martin

> 
> This sentence can likely be removed without loosing anything (but it
> also does not cause any harm).
> 
> /js
> 
> -- 
> Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
> Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
> Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> netmod@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
> 

_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

Reply via email to