"vinods.kumar" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> We have written a draft, to add annotation in YANG definition which can
> be used by the YANG compilers.
>
> We are implementing these drafts as a reference implementation in the IETF
> 96 hackathon on ONOS YANG utilities.
>
> Request you to review the below drafts and provide your comments/feedback.
>
> Draft(s):
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-agv-netmod-yang-compiler-metadata/
>
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-agv-netmod-yang-annotation-ds-and-der
> ived/
I have looked at these drafts. I have two high-level comments.
1) What you propose is not valid YANG. This new syntax would
require a new version of the YANG language.
2) What you propose is not necessary; it can be done (and is being
done in several existing implementations) with current YANG
syntax and semantics, with normal YANG extension statements.
For example, the draft proposes this:
list server {
ca:compiler-annotation{
@MappedCollection(collection-type='map', map-key='name')
@OverrideImpl('DefaultServer');
}
...
It can be done today as:
list server {
xx:mapped-collection {
xx:collection-type map;
xx:map-key name;
}
xx:override-impl DefaultServer;
...
/martin
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
