Hi Balazs,

Yes, it would be exactly as you describe: you end up having two parallel trees, with two parallel sets of mount points.

It feels like this would be an extra wart, but not the end of the world.

I also agree that avoiding the foo/foo-state split would help mitigate this.

Thanks,
Rob


On 02/08/2016 17:35, Balazs Lengyel wrote:
Hello,
If we allow foo and foo-state for opstate, mounting models atop such a multi rooted yang module will be fun.
mount modB-config-part onto modA-config-part
mount modB-state-part onto modA-state-part
One mount becomes two and you have to maintain parallel mounts otherwise you are mounting half modules.

Actually the problem is not caused by opstate, but rather by multi-rooted models. but avoiding foo-state would make life easier once more.

regards Balazs


_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

Reply via email to