Hi Balazs,
Yes, it would be exactly as you describe: you end up having two parallel
trees, with two parallel sets of mount points.
It feels like this would be an extra wart, but not the end of the world.
I also agree that avoiding the foo/foo-state split would help mitigate this.
Thanks,
Rob
On 02/08/2016 17:35, Balazs Lengyel wrote:
Hello,
If we allow foo and foo-state for opstate, mounting models atop such a
multi rooted yang module will be fun.
mount modB-config-part onto modA-config-part
mount modB-state-part onto modA-state-part
One mount becomes two and you have to maintain parallel mounts
otherwise you are mounting half modules.
Actually the problem is not caused by opstate, but rather by
multi-rooted models. but avoiding foo-state would make life easier
once more.
regards Balazs
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod