On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 8:25 AM, Ladislav Lhotka <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> > On 16 Aug 2016, at 14:54, Radek Krejčí <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Dne 16.8.2016 v 14:36 Martin Bjorklund napsal(a):
> >> Radek Krejčí <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>> Hi all,
> >>> I'm not sure what is actually the default value in leaf-list if there
> >>> are multiple default statements.  Is it each of the values defined as
> >>> default or the set of default values together? My point is, in case of
> >>> NETCONF with-defaults capability, when the leaf-list instance is
> >>> supposed to be marked as default (report-all-tagged retrieval mode) -
> >>> when it contains one of the values defined as default or only when
> >>> there is a complete set of default values (and in case of user-ordered
> >>> leaf-list, when they are in correct order)?
> >>
> >> 6020bis says:
> >>
> >>  If a leaf-list has one or more "default" statement, the leaf-list's
> >>  default values are the values of the "default" statements, and if the
> >>  leaf-list is user-ordered, the default values are used in the order of
> >>  the "default" statements.
> >>
> >> Doesn't this answer your questions?
> >
> > no, it doesn't - the "leaf-list's default values are" indicates that
> there can be multiple default values for the leaf-list. So each of the
> default statement defines one of the leaf-list's default values. But the
> second part refers to the default values to be used together, as a set. I
> think that it makes better sense to use the leaf-list's default value as a
> set, but that first sentence confuses me.
>
> leaf-list foo {
>     type string;
>     default "zig";
>     default "zag";
> }
>
> The default content is the sequence of values taken from all "default"
> statements, i.e. in JSON encoding it is
>
> "foo": ["zig", "zag"]
>
>
Or the server could return ["zag", "zig"] because this is an ordered-by
system leaf-list.

Let's say the client sets foo to the value "zag".
If the server basic-mode=explicit, then foo = [ "zag" ] and foo is not a
default.
But if the basic-mode=trim, then there was no node created, so foo is still
a default ["zig", "zag"].

Is this correct? What matches the YANG default for this node in
with-defaults trim mode?

1)
   ["zig", "zag"]

2)
   ["zig"] and ["zag"]



Andy







> Lada
>
> >
> > Radek
> >
> >>
> >> /martin
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > netmod mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>
> --
> Ladislav Lhotka, CZ.NIC Labs
> PGP Key ID: E74E8C0C
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

Reply via email to