On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 06:11:14PM +0000, Kent Watsen wrote: > [as a contributor] > > My only comment on this draft is that I’d prefer it if the “routing-state” > tree were moved into another YANG module, so that it could be more easily > deprecated when the opstate solution comes. I suggested this before, with > regards to rfc6087bis Section 5.23, but that thread seemed to have petered > out, but now here we are and my opinion remains the same. >
We already have foo:/foo /foo:foo-state modules and while we can now start a series of foo:/foo and foo-state:/foo-state modules in the hope that this will eventually 'easier' in the future, it might also be that we just create more variation and confusion. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/> _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
