On 2016-09-02 00:14, Phil Shafer wrote:
> Martin Bjorklund writes:
>> See Section 1.1 (Summary of Changes from RFC 6020)
>
> I may be missing something but it says:
>
> o Allow "choice" as a shorthand "case" statement (see
> Section 7.9.2).
>
> which is definitely in 6020.
No, it isn't:
7.9.1. The choice's Substatements
+--------------+---------+-------------+
| substatement | section | cardinality |
+--------------+---------+-------------+
| anyxml | 7.10 | 0..n |
| case | 7.9.2 | 0..n |
| config | 7.19.1 | 0..1 |
| container | 7.5 | 0..n |
| default | 7.9.3 | 0..1 |
| description | 7.19.3 | 0..1 |
| if-feature | 7.18.2 | 0..n |
| leaf | 7.6 | 0..n |
| leaf-list | 7.7 | 0..n |
| list | 7.8 | 0..n |
| mandatory | 7.9.4 | 0..1 |
| reference | 7.19.4 | 0..1 |
| status | 7.19.2 | 0..1 |
| when | 7.19.5 | 0..1 |
+--------------+---------+-------------+
7.9.2. The choice's case Statement
...
As a shorthand, the "case" statement can be omitted if the branch
contains a single "anyxml", "container", "leaf", "list", or
"leaf-list" statement.
--Per
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
