I support the adoption of this document as a WG item. Thanks.
> On Oct 22, 2016, at 6:26 AM, Kent Watsen <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Dear working group, > > Should we move to adopt draft-wilton-netmod-intf-ext-yang as a WG item > and correspondingly add this to the WG charter as a milestone? Please > comment by Friday, November 4, 2016 so that the WG Chairs can gauge > whether or not there is consensus to move forward with the document. > > To provide some context, please recall that this is the document that the > IEEE 802.1 had issues with being an IETF working group item. To address > these issues, this version of the draft: is Informational, and types that > should have been defined by IEEE have now been removed. > > Thanks, > Kent (as co-chair) > > > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod > <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod> Mahesh Jethanandani [email protected]
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
