Bill Fenner <[email protected]> wrote: > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4151 defines the "tag:" URI scheme, which > allows the creation of URIs with nearly arbitrary syntax by anyone with an > email address or domain name. E.g., > "tag:example.com,2016:yang:interface-extension". > The quirk here is the date, which exists in case example.com gets > reassigned to someone else next year. > > If authors can accept the date quirk, this is an already-existing mechanism > that is nearly identical to the one that was proposed in Xufeng's > presentation today.
I wasn't aware of this scheme, but I think this is exactly what is needed. As for the date part, it is there for a reason, so it should be acceptable. So, since this scheme exists, I don't think we should define the 'rdns' scheme. /martin _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
