> On 24 Nov 2016, at 10:33, wangzitao <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi Lada,
>
> In my understanding, it means to equal to current module's prefix.
No, it is not, because if the expression appears inside a grouping, then the
next sentence of the same bullet says "that namespace is affected by where the
grouping is used".
Lada
> For example:
>
> module ietf-foo {
> namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-foo";
> prefix foo;
>
> import ietf-interfaces {
> prefix if;
> }
>
> .....
>
> augment "/if:interfaces/if:interface"{
> list A{
> key "a";
> leaf a{
> type string;
> }
> }
> }
>
> list B{
> key "b";
> leaf b{
> type leafref{
> path "/if:interfaces/if:interface/A/a";
> }
> }
> }
>
> }
>
> In above example, the path "/if:interfaces/if:interface/A/a" equal to
> "/if:interfaces/if:interface/foo:A/foo:a".
>
> BR!
> -Michael
>
> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: netmod [mailto:[email protected]] 代表 Ladislav Lhotka
> 发送时间: 2016年11月24日 17:14
> 收件人: NETMOD WG
> 主题: [netmod] default namespace in XPath
>
> Hi,
>
> second bullet in sec. 6.4.1 of RFC 7950 says:
>
> Names without a namespace prefix belong to the same namespace as the
> identifier of the current node.
>
> But what is the current node? Is it the same as the result of the current()
> function or, if we have
>
> "/x:foo/bar"
>
> is the namespace of "bar" the one corresponding to prefix "x"?
>
> Lada
>
> --
> Ladislav Lhotka, CZ.NIC Labs
> PGP Key ID: E74E8C0C
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
--
Ladislav Lhotka, CZ.NIC Labs
PGP Key ID: E74E8C0C
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
