On 12/16/16, 8:39 AM, "netmod on behalf of Juergen Schoenwaelder"
<[email protected] on behalf of
[email protected]> wrote:
>Lada,
>
>when would I use link-layer and when link-local? Perhaps all needed is
>a clarification of the description of link-layer? (Perhaps link-local
>would have been a better name but too late now...)
>
>An RFC 3927 address could also be a 'random' address. In fact, the
>169.254/16 prefix kind of hings at RFC 3927 addresses falling under
>'random'.
Actually, I think Œrandom¹ is a more semantically correct classification
for RFC 3927 addresses than the proposed Œlink-local¹.
Acee
>
>/js
>
>On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 02:33:04PM +0100, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I think that one important enum is missing in the "ip-address-origin"
>>typedef:
>>
>> enum link-local {
>> description
>> "Indicates a link-local address.";
>> reference
>> "RFC 3927: Dynamic Configuration of IPv4 Link-Local Addresses
>> RFC 4291: IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture";
>>
>> Would an erratum be possible/useful?
>>
>> Lada
>>
>> --
>> Ladislav Lhotka, CZ.NIC Labs
>> PGP Key ID: E74E8C0C
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> netmod mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
>
>--
>Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
>Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
>Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>
>
>_______________________________________________
>netmod mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
