On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 11:05 AM, Mehmet Ersue <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Juergen, > > I don't think it is duplicate work. One is as I understand the > architecture and concept document you were asking for > and the other draft is the standard DS framework RFC to be used as the > basis for different documents. > > I do not understand the difference between these 2 documents. There should be 1 document that is protocol-independent that includes: - definition of datastores - discussion of interactions between datastores - use-cases in scope for new datastores - applicability guidance for server developers Each protocol that wants to use these new datastores needs to define mechanisms to do that in a separate document. Cheers, > Mehmet > Andy > > -----Original Message----- > From: Juergen Schoenwaelder [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Friday, January 6, 2017 7:45 PM > To: Mehmet Ersue <[email protected]> > Cc: 'Netconf' <[email protected]>; 'NetMod WG' <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Netconf] Decision on the Intended Status of the Revised DS > Draft WAS:RE: :candidate, :writable-running and RESTCONF edits > > On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 07:04:14PM +0100, Mehmet Ersue wrote: > > > > It is correct that we need a standard track document for the new DS > framework - to provide a basis for other RFCs to develope. However the > current DT solution draft has not been prepared as a standard track > document nor it has standard relevant content. Such concept description is > usually prepared as an architecture document (see example in < > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6244> RFC 6244). > > > > As I stated earlier I believe “a new protocol- and language-independent > standard document” should be prepared defining the generic datastore > framework (based on and following the concept in the DT solution draft). > > > > To me, this sounds like duplicate work for no real technical value. If the > existance of two WG results into actions like this, we should seriously > consider the option to merge NETMOD and NETCONF into one WG. > > /js > > -- > Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH > Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany > Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/> > > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod >
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
