On 09/01/2017 12:38, Lou Berger wrote:
On January 9, 2017 7:25:24 AM Ladislav Lhotka <[email protected]> wrote:
The current document involves quite a lot of hand-waving, and that's
why I was also reluctant to accept it as a WG standard-track
deliverable.
IMO I think we should do and document the work and then, once the is
general agreement, worry about number and publication status of
documents.
+1
I would like to get on with the interesting work of actually working out
the solution. Personally, I think that having it in one document makes
it easier to review/discuss/etc. I also think that it would help this
work progress more quickly which I still regard as being particularly
important.
I do also agree with Mehmet's suggestion of restructuring the existing
YANG docs to make them more consistent, but I think that it would be a
mistake to slow down this important work to what seems like a
documentation cleanup task.
Rob
Lou
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
.
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
