Understood. Let's discuss at the meeting though. This was a significant issue in the development of the IETF DMM FPC yang files and our open source project. I am open to this going in the proper direction wherever that is but wanted to bring the issue and a possible solution to the table.
Lyle On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 2:43 AM, Ladislav Lhotka <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > while the use case is clear, I believe such rather fundamental changes > to YANG cannot be done through extensions because otherwise the value of > YANG as a standard will be lost. > > Lada > > Lyle Bertz <[email protected]> writes: > > > All, > > > > This is a small submission that allows a single augment statement to be > > used to augment multiple schema locations or, at the very least, give the > > YANG to language generation tools a hint that the augment is similar to > > other augments in the module. > > > > It can be found at > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bertz-netmod-commonaugment/ > > > > It is in direct response to issues that arose writing YANG for the IETF > DMM > > FPC specification that can be found at > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dmm-fpc-cpdp/ > > > > and also in response to issues found wrt yangtools (OpenDaylight) code > > generation of the FPC specification. > > > > Lyle > > _______________________________________________ > > netmod mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod > > -- > Ladislav Lhotka, CZ.NIC Labs > PGP Key ID: 0xB8F92B08A9F76C67 >
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
