Hi all,
An issue arose recently where a certain tool failed to build the schema tree
when a feature was turned off. The problem was that an augmenting module did
not have the same if-feature statement as the node being augmented. For
example, I have these two modules.
module base-module {
prefix bmod;
feature do-things;
container things {
if-feature do-things;
...
}
}
module augment-module {
prefix amod;
augment "/bmod:do-things" {
container other-things {
}
}
}
If I included both modules and turned off the feature, 'do-things', the tool
would complain that the node being augmented did not exist. Forgetting the
obvious solution of not including the augmenting module if you don't support
the feature (this is a very simplified example), my thought was that the schema
tree should first be built including all augments, then the feature is applied.
What are your thoughts on this? Surely, an augment should not have to contain
if-feature statements of all parents of the augmented node.
Best regards,
Joey
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
