Hi,
RFC7950 section 7.9.2. says that if a “case” statement is omitted (i.e. “case”
shorthand) and implicit “case” node is created, schema node identifiers MUST
always explicitly include the implicit “case” node identifiers. So the
following snippet from yang model (below) is valid for Yang 1.1. However, is it
also valid for Yang 1.0 ? RFC6020 is not clear about this and there is no
section saying that schema node identifiers MUST always explicitly include the
implicit “case” node identifiers…
choice my-choice {
container implicit-case-container {
}
}
augment "/my-choice/implicit-case-container" {
leaf leaf-after-container {
type empty;
}
}
augment "/my-choice/implicit-case-container/implicit-case-container" {
leaf leaf-inside-container {
type empty;
}
}
Thanks.
[http://wwwin.cisco.com/c/dam/cec/organizations/gmcc/services-tools/signaturetool/images/logo/logo_Cisco_Blue.png]
Peter Kajsa
Engineer - Software
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Tel:
Cisco Systems, Inc.
Slovakia
cisco.com
[http://www.cisco.com/assets/swa/img/thinkbeforeyouprint.gif]Think before you
print.
This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of
the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others
is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to
receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply email and delete
all copies of this message.
Please click
here<http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html> for
Company Registration Information.
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
![http://www.cisco.com/assets/swa/img/thinkbeforeyouprint.gif]Think](http://www.cisco.com/assets/swa/img/thinkbeforeyouprint.gif]Think){kind=link}