> On Mar 28, 2017, at 10:03 AM, Zhengguangying (Walker) > <zhengguangy...@huawei.com> wrote: > > Hi Martin, > > My comments is why it need YANG modules change there definition? > datastore is the conception of system datastore mechinism, we can use filter > or common top level YANG modul to support multi datastore. > But, if ask YANG modules to change their definition to use split tree, > it will bound the datastore logic to YANG modules, it not looks like a good > idea, because all YANG modules should change and know the datastore.
I do not think there is anything in the proposal that says that YANG modules will be bound to a particular datastore, or that they need to know about the different datastores a particular implementation supports. The suggestion to collapse the config and state part of the tree is to avoid data getting duplicated as a result of implementation of the new datastore concept. > > So, my suggestion is not sue split tree in YANG modules, but support it > by netconf or another new TOP level YANG module. > > Thanks > > Zheng guangying (walker) From Huawei > _______________________________________________ > Netconf mailing list > netc...@ietf.org <mailto:netc...@ietf.org> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf > <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netconf> Mahesh Jethanandani mjethanand...@gmail.com
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
