Hi Alex,
in earlier revisions of the ietf-routing module (up to
draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg-17), we had a configuration item
("recipient-ribs") that allowed for assigning RIBs to routing protocol
instances. The reason for removing it is summarized in my presentation from
IETF 92, slides 10 and 11:
https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/92/slides/slides-92-netmod-9.pdf
(and yes, I wasn't a big fan of this change).
Maybe Acee can give additional background.
Lada
> On 7 Jun 2017, at 01:43, Alex Campbell <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I noticed that the ietf-routing YANG (published in RFC 8022) allows for
> multiple instances of each control plane protocol, as well as multiple RIBs
> per address family.
> However I don't see any way to associate one with the other. Without
> additional configuration, protocols will only place their routes in default
> RIBs.
> Is it intended that this will be left to vendor-specific modules and/or
> future standards?
>
> Alex
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
--
Ladislav Lhotka, CZ.NIC Labs
PGP Key ID: 0xB8F92B08A9F76C67
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
