Unless someone disagrees, with a good reason, I am going to go ahead and close this issue.
> On Jul 7, 2017, at 2:19 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) <[email protected]> wrote: > > My opinion is absolutely not. Past attempts to mix forwarding and routing > policy have been, at best, very confusing. This issue should be removed from > section 8 and closed. > > Thanks, > Acee > > From: netmod <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> on > behalf of Mahesh Jethanandani <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> > Date: Friday, July 7, 2017 at 5:03 PM > To: NetMod WG <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > Subject: [netmod] draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-11 issue #4 > > Created issue #4 in github <https://github.com/netmod-wg/acl-model/issues/4> > as "Should this model include route-policy definition as defined in > draft-ietf-rtgwg-policy-model?” > > with the following description: > > The title says it all. The only note is that the draft in question has > expired, so it is not clear what the status of those definitions are. > > > Mahesh Jethanandani > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > > > Mahesh Jethanandani [email protected]
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
