All, In the context iana-routing-types.yang, we’ve been having a discussion of the merits of identities vs enums. We’ve followed the lead of RFC 7224 and used identities which allow augmentation. However, for IANA code points, there could be merit in having the type represent the actual numeric value. Any thoughts on this?
In the next version of YANG, it would be useful for a base identity to allow it to have a "base-type" (mutually exclusive of "identity-ref"). For all identities a "base-value" would be allowed as long as it conformed to the constraints of the actual or inherited (via “identity-ref”) “base-type”. Thanks, Acee
_______________________________________________ netmod mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
