I've read this draft and would also support it being adopted as a WG document.

Given that lots of models depend on ietf-interfaces, the sooner that we can get this published as an updated RFC the better. Realistically, how quickly can we get the IETF machinery to move on this and the few other equivalent drafts?

Thanks,
Rob


On 21/08/2017 09:06, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
Hi,

This document defines an NMDA-compliant update to the interfaces model
(RFC 7223).  This is done by deprectaing the /interfaces-state tree
and moving the config false nodes into the /interfaces tree.

I would like to ask the WG to adopt this individual draft as a working
group document.


/martin



_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

Reply via email to