FYI I've asked folks in the routing area, i.e., the ietf users of schema
mount, if they have an opinion on the node discussion. I will also do so on
the point I raised on parent reference location. (Which is independent from
your format change.) Clearly, if I'm the only one to be raising objections,
I'll be the one in the rough on these points.
Thanks,
Lou
- as contributor
On August 30, 2017 3:42:26 AM Martin Bjorklund <[email protected]> wrote:
Ladislav Lhotka <[email protected]> wrote:
Lou Berger <[email protected]> writes:
> Lada,
>
>
> On 8/28/2017 10:16 AM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
>> Lou Berger píše v Po 28. 08. 2017 v 09:40 -0400:
[...]
>>> PS is your view aligned with martin or our example?
>> If you mean shifting the XPath context node to the mount point instance,
then
>> yes.
So, going back to the original issue; does anyone have any objection
to changing the XPath context for parent-reference as describied in my
original post?
/martin
_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
