On Sat, Sep 02, 2017 at 10:39:57AM +0000, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
> 
> This is not an effort to change or bifurcate the YANG 1.1. It is simply to
> RECOMMEND a proper subset of XSD pattern that is more portable.
>

If you implement YANG as it is defined, pattern are portable. Given
this, I do not understand the notion of 'more portable'.

Anyway, it seems that those who want a more portable subset do not
even agree on what that subset is. Perhaps people pushing for this
should go and write an I-D that explains why a 'more portable' subset
is needed (which problems are we fixing), that defines such a 'more
portable subset', and which includes the reasoning how the subset has
been determined.

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>

_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

Reply via email to